and Gallo hadn’t really found this evidence, and why had they been

  fighting so hard to get credit for the discovery? He says he was

  hesitant to write ‘HIV is the probable cause of AIDS’ until he found

  published evidence to support that. ‘Tens of thousands of scientists

  and researchers were spending billions of dollars a year doing

  research based on this idea,’ Mullis writes. ‘The reason had to be

  there somewhere; otherwise these people would not have allowed

  their research to se le into one narrow channel of investigation.’ He

  said he lectured about PCR at numerous meetings where people

  were always talking about HIV and he asked them how they knew

  that HIV was the cause of AIDS:

  Everyone said something. Everyone had the answer at home, in the office, in some drawer.

  They all knew, and they would send me the papers as soon as they got back. But I never got any papers. Nobody ever sent me the news about how AIDS was caused by HIV.

  Eventually Mullis was able to ask Montagnier himself about the

  reference proof when he lectured in San Diego at the grand opening

  of the University of California AIDS Research Center. Mullis says

  this was the last time he would ask his question without showing

  anger. Montagnier said he should reference the CDC report. ‘I read

  it’, Mullis said, and it didn’t answer the question. ‘If Montagnier

  didn’t know the answer who the hell did?’ Then one night Mullis

  was driving when an interview came on National Public Radio with

  Peter Duesberg, a prominent virologist at Berkeley and a California

  Scientist of the Year. Mullis says he finally understood why he could

  not find references that connected HIV to AIDS – there weren’t any!

  No one had ever proved that HIV causes AIDS even though it had

  spawned a multi-billion pound global industry and the media was

  repeating this as fact every day in their articles and broadcasts

  terrifying the shit out of people about AIDS and giving the

  impression that a positive test for HIV (see ‘Covid’) was a death

  sentence. Duesberg was a threat to the AIDS gravy train and the

  agenda that underpinned it. He was therefore abused and castigated

  a er he told the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

  there was no good evidence implicating the new ‘virus’. Editors

  rejected his manuscripts and his research funds were deleted. Mullis

  points out that the CDC has defined AIDS as one of more than 30

  diseases if accompanied by a positive result on a test that detects

  antibodies to HIV; but those same diseases are not defined as AIDS

  cases when antibodies are not detected:

  If an HIV-positive woman develops uterine cancer, for example, she is considered to have AIDS. If she is not HIV positive, she simply has uterine cancer. An HIV-positive man with tuberculosis has AIDS; if he tests negative he simply has tuberculosis. If he lives in Kenya or Colombia, where the test for HIV antibodies is too expensive, he is simply presumed to have the antibodies and therefore AIDS, and therefore he can be treated in the World Health Organization’s clinic. It’s the only medical help available in some places. And it’s free, because the countries that support WHO are worried about AIDS.

  Mullis accuses the CDC of continually adding new diseases (see ever

  more ‘Covid symptoms’) to the grand AIDS definition and of

  virtually doctoring the books to make it appear as if the disease

  continued to spread. He cites how in 1993 the CDC enormously

  broadened its AIDS definition and county health authorities were

  delighted because they received $2,500 per year from the Federal

  government for every reported AIDS case. Ladies and gentlemen, I

  have just described, via Kary Mullis, the ‘Covid pandemic’ of 2020

  and beyond. Every element is the same and it’s been pulled off in the

  same way by the same networks.

  The ‘Covid virus’ exists? Okay – prove it. Er … still waiting

  What Kary Mullis described with regard to ‘HIV’ has been repeated

  with ‘Covid’. A claim is made that a new, or ‘novel’, infection has

  been found and the entire medical system of the world repeats that

  as fact exactly as they did with HIV and AIDS. No one in the

  mainstream asks rather relevant questions such as ‘How do you

  know?’ and ‘Where is your proof?’ The SARS-Cov-2 ‘virus’ and the

  ‘Covid-19 disease’ became an overnight ‘everybody-knows-that’.

  The origin could be debated and mulled over, but what you could

  not suggest was that ‘SARS-Cov-2’ didn’t exist. That would be

  ridiculous. ‘Everybody knows’ the ‘virus’ exists. Well, I didn’t for one along with American proper doctors like Andrew Kaufman and

  Tom Cowan and long-time American proper journalist Jon

  Rappaport. We dared to pursue the obvious and simple question:

  ‘Where’s the evidence?’ The overwhelming majority in medicine,

  journalism and the general public did not think to ask that. A er all,

  everyone knew there was a new ‘virus’. Everyone was saying so and I

  heard it on the BBC. Some would eventually argue that the ‘deadly

  virus’ was nothing like as deadly as claimed, but few would venture

  into the realms of its very existence. Had they done so they would

  have found that the evidence for that claim had gone AWOL as with

  HIV causes AIDS. In fact, not even that. For something to go AWOL

  it has to exist in the first place and scientific proof for a ‘SARS-Cov-2’

  can be filed under nothing, nowhere and zilch.

  Dr Andrew Kaufman is a board-certified forensic psychiatrist in

  New York State, a Doctor of Medicine and former Assistant

  Professor and Medical Director of Psychiatry at SUNY Upstate

  Medical University, and Medical Instructor of Hematology and

  Oncology at the Medical School of South Carolina. He also studied

  biology at the Massachuse s Institute of Technology (MIT) and

  trained in Psychiatry at Duke University. Kaufman is retired from

  allopathic medicine, but remains a consultant and educator on

  natural healing, I saw a video of his very early on in the ‘Covid’ hoax

  in which he questioned claims about the ‘virus’ in the absence of any

  supporting evidence and with plenty pointing the other way. I did

  everything I could to circulate his work which I felt was asking the

  pivotal questions that needed an answer. I can recommend an

  excellent pull-together interview he did with the website The Last

  Vagabond entitled Dr Andrew Kaufman: Virus Isolation, Terrain Theory

  and Covid-19 and his website is andrewkaufmanmd.com. Kaufman is

  not only a forensic psychiatrist; he is forensic in all that he does. He

  always reads original scientific papers, experiments and studies

  instead of second-third-fourth-hand reports about the ‘virus’ in the

  media which are repeating the repeated repetition of the narrative.

  When he did so with the original Chinese ‘virus’ papers Kaufman

  realised that there was no evidence of a ‘SARS-Cov-2’. They had

  never – from the start – shown it to exist and every repeat of this

  claim worldwide was based on the accepted existence of proof that

  was nowhere to be found – see Kary Mullis and HIV. Here we go

  again.

  Let’s postulate

  Kaufman discovered that the Chinese authorities immediately

  concluded that the cause of an illness that broke out among about

  200 initial patients in Wuhan was a ‘new virus’ when there were no

  grounds to make that conclusion. The alleged ‘virus’ was not

  isolated from other genetic material in their samples and then shown

  through a system known as Koch’s postulates to be the causative

  agent of the illness. The world was told that the SARS-Cov-2 ‘virus’

  caused a disease they called ‘Covid-19’ which had ‘flu-like’

  symptoms and could lead to respiratory problems and pneumonia.

  If it wasn’t so tragic it would almost be funny. ‘Flu-like’ symptoms’?

  Pneumonia? Respiratory disease? What in CHINA and particularly in

  Wuhan, one of the most polluted cities in the world with a resulting

  epidemic of respiratory disease?? Three hundred thousand people

  get pneumonia in China every year and there are nearly a billion

  cases worldwide of ‘flu-like symptoms’. These have a whole range of

  causes – including pollution in Wuhan – but no other possibility was

  credibly considered in late 2019 when the world was told there was a

  new and deadly ‘virus’. The global prevalence of pneumonia and

  ‘flu-like systems’ gave the Cult networks unlimited potential to re-

  diagnose these other causes as the mythical ‘Covid-19’ and that is

  what they did from the very start. Kaufman revealed how Chinese

  medical and science authorities (all subordinates to the Cult-owned

  communist government) took genetic material from the lungs of

  only a few of the first patients. The material contained their own

  cells, bacteria, fungi and other microorganisms living in their bodies.

  The only way you could prove the existence of the ‘virus’ and its

  responsibility for the alleged ‘Covid-19’ was to isolate the virus from

  all the other material – a process also known as ‘purification’ – and

  then follow the postulates sequence developed in the late 19th

  century by German physician and bacteriologist Robert Koch which

  became the ‘gold standard’ for connecting an alleged causation

  agent to a disease:

  1. The microorganism (bacteria, fungus, virus, etc.) must be present in every case of the disease and all patients must have the same symptoms. It must also not be present in healthy individuals.

  2. The microorganism must be isolated from the host with the disease. If the microorganism is a bacteria or fungus it must be grown in a pure culture. If it is a virus, it must be purified (i.e. containing no other material except the virus particles) from a clinical sample.

  3. The specific disease, with all of its characteristics, must be reproduced when the infectious agent (the purified virus or a pure culture of bacteria or fungi) is inoculated into a healthy, susceptible host.

  4. The microorganism must be recoverable from the experimentally infected host as in step 2.

  Not one of these criteria has been met in the case of ‘SARS-Cov-2’ and

  ‘Covid-19’. Not ONE. EVER. Robert Koch refers to bacteria and not

  viruses. What are called ‘viral particles’ are so minute (hence masks

  are useless by any definition) that they could only be seen a er the

  invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s and can still only

  be observed through that means. American bacteriologist and

  virologist Thomas Milton Rivers, the so-called ‘Father of Modern

  Virology’ who was very significantly director of the Rockefeller

  Institute for Medical Research in the 1930s, developed a less

  stringent version of Koch’s postulates to identify ‘virus’ causation

  known as ‘Rivers criteria’. ‘Covid’ did not pass that process either.

  Some even doubt whether any ‘virus’ can be isolated from other

  particles containing genetic material in the Koch method. Freedom

  of Information requests in many countries asking for scientific proof

  that the ‘Covid virus’ has been purified and isolated and shown to

  exist have all come back with a ‘we don’t have that’ and when this

  happened with a request to the UK Department of Health they

  added this comment:

  However, outside of the scope of the [Freedom of Information Act] and on a discretionary basis, the following information has been advised to us, which may be of interest. Most infectious diseases are caused by viruses, bacteria or fungi. Some bacteria or fungi have the capacity to grow on their own in isolation, for example in colonies on a petri dish. Viruses are different in that they are what we call ‘obligate pathogens’ – that is, they cannot survive or reproduce without infecting a host ...

  … For some diseases, it is possible to establish causation between a microorganism and a disease by isolating the pathogen from a patient, growing it in pure culture and reintroducing it to a healthy organism. These are known as ‘Koch’s postulates’ and were developed in 1882.

  However, as our understanding of disease and different disease-causing agents has advanced, these are no longer the method for determining causation [Andrew Kaufman asks why in that case are there two published articles falsely claiming to satisfy Koch’s postulates].

  It has long been known that viral diseases cannot be identified in this way as viruses cannot be grown in ‘pure culture’. When a patient is tested for a viral illness, this is normally done by looking for the presence of antigens, or viral genetic code in a host with molecular biology techniques [Kaufman asks how you could know the origin of these chemicals without having a pure culture for comparison].

  For the record ‘antigens’ are defined so:

  Invading microorganisms have antigens on their surface that the human body can recognise as being foreign – meaning not belonging to it. When the body recognises a foreign antigen, lymphocytes (white blood cells) produce antibodies, which are complementary in shape to the antigen.

  Notwithstanding that this is open to question in relation to ‘SARS-

  Cov-2’ the presence of ‘antibodies’ can have many causes and they

  are found in people that are perfectly well. Kary Mullis said:

  ‘Antibodies … had always been considered evidence of past disease,

  not present disease.’

  ‘Covid’ really is a computer ‘virus’

  Where the UK Department of Health statement says ‘viruses’ are

  now ‘diagnosed’ through a ‘viral genetic code in a host with

  molecular biology techniques’, they mean … the PCR test which its

  inventor said cannot test for infectious disease. They have no

  credible method of connecting a ‘virus’ to a disease and we will see

  that there is no scientific proof that any ‘virus’ causes any disease or

  there is any such thing as a ‘virus’ in the way that it is described.

  Tenacious Canadian researcher Christine Massey and her team made

  some 40 Freedom of Information requests to national public health

  agencies in different countries asking for proof that SARS-CoV-2 has

  been isolated and not one of them could supply that information.

  Massey said of her request in Canada: ‘Freedom of Information

  reveals Public Health Agency of Canada has no record of ‘SARS-

  COV-2’ isolation performed by anyone, anywhere, ever.’ If you

  accept the comment from the UK Department of Health it’s because

  they can’t isolate a ‘virus’. Even so many ‘science’ papers claimed to

  have isolated the ‘Covid virus’ until they were questioned and had

  to admit they hadn’t. A reply from the Robert Koch Institute in

  Germany was typical: ‘I am not aware of a paper which purified

  isolated SARS-CoV-2.’ So what the hell was Christian Drosten and

  his gang using to design the ‘Covid’ testing protocol that has

  produced all the illusory Covid’ cases and ‘Covid’ deaths when the

  head of the Chinese version of the CDC admi ed there was a

  problem right from the start in that the ‘virus’ had never been

  isolated/purified? Breathe deeply: What they are calling ‘Covid’ is

  actually created by a computer program i.e. they made it up – er, that’s it. They took lung fluid, with many sources of genetic material, from

  one single person alleged to be infected with Covid-19 by a PCR test

  which they claimed, without clear evidence, contained a ‘virus’. They

  used several computer programs to create a model of a theoretical

  virus genome sequence from more than fi y-six million small

  sequences of RNA, each of an unknown source, assembling them

  like a puzzle with no known solution. The computer filled in the

  gaps with sequences from bits in the gene bank to make it look like a

  bat SARS-like coronavirus! A wave of the magic wand and poof, an

  in silico (computer-generated) genome, a scientific fantasy, was

  created. UK health researcher Dr Kevin Corbe made the same point

  with this analogy:

  … It’s like giving you a few bones and saying that’s your fish. It could be any fish. Not even a skeleton. Here’s a few fragments of bones. That’s your fish … It’s all from gene bank and the bits of the virus sequence that weren’t there they made up.

  They synthetically created them to fill in the blanks. That’s what genetics is; it’s a code. So it’s ABBBCCDDD and you’re missing some what you think is EEE so you put it in. It’s all

  synthetic. You just manufacture the bits that are missing. This is the end result of the geneticization of virology. This is basically a computer virus.

  Further confirmation came in an email exchange between British

  citizen journalist Frances Leader and the government’s Medicines &

  Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (the Gates-funded MHRA)

  which gave emergency permission for untested ‘Covid vaccines’ to

  be used. The agency admi ed that the ‘vaccine’ is not based on an