properties of the cell’. Researchers at the Sloan Ke ering Institute in

  New York found that changes in messenger RNA can deactivate

  tumour-suppressing proteins and thereby promote cancer. This is

  what happens when you mess with messaging. ‘Covid vaccine’

  maker Moderna was founded in 2010 by Canadian stem cell

  biologist Derrick J. Rossi a er his breakthrough discovery in the field

  of transforming and reprogramming stem cells. These are neutral

  cells that can be programmed to become any cell including sperm

  cells. Moderna was therefore founded on the principle of genetic

  manipulation and has never produced any vaccine or drug before its

  genetically-manipulating synthetic ‘Covid’ shite. Look at the name –

  Mode-RNA or Modify-RNA. Another important point is that the US

  Supreme Court has ruled that genetically-modified DNA, or

  complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesized in the laboratory from

  messenger RNA, can be patented and owned. These psychopaths are

  doing this to the human body.

  Cells replicate synthetic mRNA in the ‘Covid vaccines’ and in

  theory the body is tricked into making antigens which trigger

  antibodies to target the ‘virus spike proteins’ which as Dr Tom

  Cowan said have never been seen. Cut the crap and these ‘vaccines’

  deliver self-replicating synthetic material to the cells with the effect of changing human DNA. The more of them you have the more that

  process is compounded while synthetic material is all the time self-

  replicating. ‘Vaccine’-maker Moderna describes mRNA as ‘like

  so ware for the cell’ and so they are messing with the body’s

  so ware. What happens when you change the so ware in a

  computer? Everything changes. For this reason the Cult is preparing

  a production line of mRNA ‘Covid vaccines’ and a long list of

  excuses to use them as with all the ‘variants’ of a ‘virus’ never shown

  to exist. The plan is further to transfer the mRNA technique to other

  vaccines mostly given to children and young people. The cumulative

  consequences will be a transformation of human DNA through a

  constant infusion of synthetic genetic material which will kill many

  and change the rest. Now consider that governments that have given

  emergency approval for a vaccine that’s not a vaccine; never been

  approved for humans before; had no testing worth the name; and

  the makers have been given immunity from prosecution for any

  deaths or adverse effects suffered by the public. The UK government

  awarded permanent legal indemnity to itself and its employees for

  harm done when a patient is being treated for ‘Covid-19’ or

  ‘suspected Covid-19’. That is quite a thought when these are possible

  ‘side-effects’ from the ‘vaccine’ (they are not ‘side’, they are effects)

  listed by the US Food and Drug Administration:

  Guillain-Barre syndrome; acute disseminated encephalomyelitis;

  transverse myelitis; encephalitis; myelitis; encephalomyelitis;

  meningoencephalitis; meningitis; encephalopathy; convulsions;

  seizures; stroke; narcolepsy; cataplexy; anaphylaxis; acute

  myocardial infarction (heart a ack); myocarditis; pericarditis;

  autoimmune disease; death; implications for pregnancy, and birth

  outcomes; other acute demyelinating diseases; non anaphylactic

  allergy reactions; thrombocytopenia ; disseminated intravascular

  coagulation; venous thromboembolism; arthritis; arthralgia; joint

  pain; Kawasaki disease; multisystem inflammatory syndrome in

  children; vaccine enhanced disease. The la er is the way the

  ‘vaccine’ has the potential to make diseases far worse than they

  would otherwise be.

  UK doctor and freedom campaigner Vernon Coleman described

  the conditions in this list as ‘all unpleasant, most of them very

  serious, and you can’t get more serious than death’. The thought that

  anyone at all has had the ‘vaccine’ in these circumstances is

  testament to the potential that humanity has for clueless,

  unquestioning, stupidity and for many that programmed stupidity

  has already been terminal.

  An insider speaks

  Dr Michael Yeadon is a former Vice President, head of research and

  Chief Scientific Adviser at vaccine giant Pfizer. Yeadon worked on

  the inside of Big Pharma, but that did not stop him becoming a vocal

  critic of ‘Covid vaccines’ and their potential for multiple harms,

  including infertility in women. By the spring of 2021 he went much

  further and even used the no, no, term ‘conspiracy’. When you begin

  to see what is going on it is impossible not to do so. Yeadon spoke

  out in an interview with freedom campaigner James Delingpole and

  I mentioned earlier how he said that no one had samples of ‘the

  virus’. He explained that the mRNA technique originated in the anti-

  cancer field and ways to turn on and off certain genes which could

  be advantageous if you wanted to stop cancer growing out of

  control. ‘That’s the origin of them. They are a very unusual

  application, really.’ Yeadon said that treating a cancer patient with

  an aggressive procedure might be understandable if the alternative

  was dying, but it was quite another thing to use the same technique

  as a public health measure. Most people involved wouldn’t catch the

  infectious agent you were vaccinating against and if they did they

  probably wouldn’t die:

  If you are really using it as a public health measure you really want to as close as you can get to zero sides-effects … I find it odd that they chose techniques that were really cutting their teeth in the field of oncology and I’m worried that in using gene-based vaccines that have to be injected in the body and spread around the body, get taken up into some cells, and the regulators haven’t quite told us which cells they get taken up into … you are going to be generating a wide range of responses … with multiple steps each of which could go well or badly.

  I doubt the Cult intends it to go well. Yeadon said that you can put any gene you like into the body through the ‘vaccine’. ‘You can

  certainly give them a gene that would do them some harm if you

  wanted.’ I was intrigued when he said that when used in the cancer

  field the technique could turn genes on and off. I explore this process

  in The Answer and with different genes having different functions

  you could create mayhem – physically and psychologically – if you

  turned the wrong ones on and the right ones off. I read reports of an

  experiment by researchers at the University of Washington’s school

  of computer science and engineering in which they encoded DNA to

  infect computers. The body is itself a biological computer and if

  human DNA can inflict damage on a computer why can’t the

  computer via synthetic material mess with the human body? It can.

  The Washington research team said it was possible to insert

  malicious malware into ‘physical DNA strands’ and corrupt the

  computer system of a gene sequencing machine as it ‘reads gene

  le ers and stores them as binary digits 0 and 1’. They concluded that

  hackers could one day use blood or spit samples to access computer

  systems and obtain sensitive data from police forensics labs or infect

  genome files. It is at this level of digital interaction that synthetic

  ‘vaccines’ need to be seen to get the full picture and that will become

  very clear later on. Michael Yeadon said it made no sense to give the

  ‘vaccine’ to younger people who were in no danger from the ‘virus’.

  What was the benefit? It was all downside with potential effects:

  The fact that my government in what I thought was a civilised, rational country, is raining [the

  ‘vaccine’] on people in their 30s and 40s, even my children in their 20s, they’re getting letters and phone calls, I know this is not right and any of you doctors who are vaccinating you know it’s not right, too. They are not at risk. They are not at risk from the disease, so you are now hoping that the side-effects are so rare that you get away with it. You don’t give new technology … that you don’t understand to 100 percent of the population.

  Blood clot problems with the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’ have been

  affecting younger people to emphasise the downside risks with no

  benefit. AstraZeneca’s version, produced with Oxford University,

  does not use mRNA, but still gets its toxic cocktail inside cells where

  it targets DNA. The Johnson & Johnson ‘vaccine’ which uses a

  similar technique has also produced blood clot effects to such an

  extent that the United States paused its use at one point. They are all

  ‘gene therapy’ (cell modification) procedures and not ‘vaccines’. The

  truth is that once the content of these injections enter cells we have

  no idea what the effect will be. People can speculate and some can

  give very educated opinions and that’s good. In the end, though,

  only the makers know what their potions are designed to do and

  even they won’t know every last consequence. Michael Yeadon was

  scathing about doctors doing what they knew to be wrong.

  ‘Everyone’s mute’, he said. Doctors in the NHS must know this was

  not right, coming into work and injecting people. ‘I don’t know how

  they sleep at night. I know I couldn’t do it. I know that if I were in

  that position I’d have to quit.’ He said he knew enough about

  toxicology to know this was not a good risk-benefit. Yeadon had

  spoken to seven or eight university professors and all except two

  would not speak out publicly. Their universities had a policy that no

  one said anything that countered the government and its medical

  advisors. They were afraid of losing their government grants. This is

  how intimidation has been used to silence the truth at every level of

  the system. I say silence, but these people could still speak out if they

  made that choice. Yeadon called them ‘moral cowards’ – ‘This is

  about your children and grandchildren’s lives and you have just

  buggered off and le it.’

  ‘Variant’ nonsense

  Some of his most powerful comments related to the alleged

  ‘variants’ being used to instil more fear, justify more lockdowns, and

  introduce more ‘vaccines’. He said government claims about

  ‘variants’ were nonsense. He had checked the alleged variant ‘codes’

  and they were 99.7 percent identical to the ‘original’. This was the

  human identity difference equivalent to pu ing a baseball cap on

  and off or wearing it the other way round. A 0.3 percent difference

  would make it impossible for that ‘variant’ to escape immunity from

  the ‘original’. This made no sense of having new ‘vaccines’ for

  ‘variants’. He said there would have to be at least a 30 percent difference for that to be justified and even then he believed the

  immune system would still recognise what it was. Gates-funded

  ‘variant modeller’ and ‘vaccine’-pusher John Edmunds might care to

  comment. Yeadon said drug companies were making new versions

  of the ‘vaccine’ as a ‘top up’ for ‘variants’. Worse than that, he said,

  the ‘regulators’ around the world like the MHRA in the UK had got

  together and agreed that because ‘vaccines’ for ‘variants’ were so

  similar to the first ‘vaccines’ they did not have to do safety studies. How transparently sinister that is. This is when Yeadon said: ‘There is a

  conspiracy here.’ There was no need for another vaccine for

  ‘variants’ and yet we were told that there was and the country had

  shut its borders because of them. ‘They are going into hundreds of

  millions of arms without passing ‘go’ or any regulator. Why did they

  do that? Why did they pick this method of making the vaccine?’

  The reason had to be something bigger than that it seemed and

  ‘it’s not protection against the virus’. It’s was a far bigger project that

  meant politicians and advisers were willing to do things and not do

  things that knowingly resulted in avoidable deaths – ‘that’s already

  happened when you think about lockdown and deprivation of

  health care for a year.’ He spoke of people prepared to do something

  that results in the avoidable death of their fellow human beings and

  it not bother them. This is the penny-drop I have been working to

  get across for more than 30 years – the level of pure evil we are

  dealing with. Yeadon said his friends and associates could not

  believe there could be that much evil, but he reminded them of

  Stalin, Pol Pot and Hitler and of what Stalin had said: ‘One death is a

  tragedy. A million? A statistic.’ He could not think of a benign

  explanation for why you need top-up vaccines ‘which I’m sure you

  don’t’ and for the regulators ‘to just get out of the way and wave

  them through’. Why would the regulators do that when they were

  still wrestling with the dangers of the ‘parent’ vaccine? He was

  clearly shocked by what he had seen since the ‘Covid’ hoax began

  and now he was thinking the previously unthinkable:

  If you wanted to depopulate a significant proportion of the world and to do it in a way that doesn’t involve destruction of the environment with nuclear weapons, poisoning everyone with anthrax or something like that, and you wanted plausible deniability while you had a multi-year infectious disease crisis, I actually don’t think you could come up with a better plan of work than seems to be in front of me. I can’t say that’s what they are going to do, but I can’t think of a benign explanation why they are doing it.

  He said he never thought that they would get rid of 99 percent of

  humans, but now he wondered. ‘If you wanted to that this would be

  a hell of a way to do it – it would be unstoppable folks.’ Yeadon had

  concluded that those who submi ed to the ‘vaccine’ would be

  allowed to have some kind of normal life (but for how long?) while

  screws were tightened to coerce and mandate the last few percent. ‘I

  think they’ll put the rest of them in a prison camp. I wish I was

  wrong, but I don’t think I am.’ Other points he made included: There

  were no coronavirus vaccines then suddenly they all come along at

  the same time; we have no idea of the long term affect with trials so

  short; coercing or forcing people to have medical procedures is

  against the Nuremberg Code instigated when the Nazis did just that;

  people should at least delay having the ‘vaccine’; a quick Internet

  search confirms that masks don’t reduce respiratory viral

  transmission and ‘the government knows that’; they have smashed

  civil society and they know that, too; two dozen peer-reviewed

  studies show no connection between lockdown and reducing deaths;

  he knew from personal friends the elite were still flying around and

  going on holiday while the public were locked down; the elite were

  not having the ‘vaccines’. He was also asked if ‘vaccines’ could be

  made to target difference races. He said he didn’t know, but the

  document by the Project for the New American Century in

  September, 2000, said developing ‘advanced forms of biological

  warfare that can target specific genotypes may transform biological

  warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.’ Oh,

  they’re evil all right. Of that we can be absolutely sure.

  Another cull of old people

  We have seen from the CDC definition that the mRNA ‘Covid

  vaccine’ is not a vaccine and nor are the others that claim to reduce

  ‘severity of symptoms’ in some people, but not protect from infection

  or transmission. What about all the lies about returning to ‘normal’ if

  people were ‘vaccinated’? If they are not claimed to stop infection

  and transmission of the alleged ‘virus’, how does anything change?

  This was all lies to manipulate people to take the jabs and we are

  seeing that now with masks and distancing still required for the

  ‘vaccinated’. How did they think that elderly people with fragile

  health and immune responses were going to be affected by infusing

  their cells with synthetic material and other toxic substances? They

  knew that in the short and long term it would be devastating and

  fatal as the culling of the old that began with the first lockdowns was

  continued with the ‘vaccine’. Death rates in care homes soared

  immediately residents began to be ‘vaccinated’ – infused with

  synthetic material. Brave and commi ed whistleblower nurses put

  their careers at risk by exposing this truth while the rest kept their

  heads down and their mouths shut to put their careers before those

  they are supposed to care for. A long-time American Certified

  Nursing Assistant who gave his name as James posted a video in

  which he described emotionally what happened in his care home