oxygen deprivation continues through wearing a mask. Nerve cells

  in the brain are unable to divide themselves normally in these

  circumstances and lost nerve cells will no longer be regenerated.

  ‘What is gone is gone.’ Now consider that people like shop workers

  and schoolchildren are wearing masks for hours every day. What in

  the name of sanity is going to be happening to them? ‘I do not wear

  a mask, I need my brain to think’, Griesz-Brisson said, ‘I want to

  have a clear head when I deal with my patients and not be in a

  carbon dioxide-induced anaesthesia’. If you are told to wear a mask

  anywhere ask the organisation, police, store, whatever, for their risk

  assessment on the dangers and negative effects on mind and body of

  enforcing mask-wearing. They won’t have one because it has never

  been done not even by government. All of them must be subject to

  class-action lawsuits as the consequences come to light. They don’t

  do mask risk assessments for an obvious reason. They know what

  the conclusions would be and independent scientific studies that

  have been done tell a horror story of consequences.

  ‘Masks are criminal’

  Dr Griesz-Brisson said that for children and adolescents, masks are

  an absolute no-no. They had an extremely active and adaptive

  immune system and their brain was incredibly active with so much

  to learn. ‘The child’s brain, or the youth’s brain, is thirsting for

  oxygen.’ The more metabolically active an organ was, the more

  oxygen it required; and in children and adolescents every organ was

  metabolically active. Griesz-Brisson said that to deprive a child’s or

  adolescent’s brain of oxygen, or to restrict it in any way, was not only

  dangerous to their health, it was absolutely criminal. ‘Oxygen

  deficiency inhibits the development of the brain, and the damage

  that has taken place as a result CANNOT be reversed.’ Mind

  manipulators of MKUltra put masks on two-year-olds they wanted

  to neurologically rewire and you can see why. Griesz-Brisson said a

  child needs the brain to learn and the brain needs oxygen to

  function. ‘We don’t need a clinical study for that. This is simple,

  indisputable physiology.’ Consciously and purposely induced

  oxygen deficiency was an absolutely deliberate health hazard, and

  an absolute medical contraindication which means that ‘this drug,

  this therapy, this method or measure should not be used, and is not

  allowed to be used’. To coerce an entire population to use an

  absolute medical contraindication by force, she said, there had to be

  definite and serious reasons and the reasons must be presented to

  competent interdisciplinary and independent bodies to be verified

  and authorised. She had this warning of the consequences that were

  coming if mask wearing continued:

  When, in ten years, dementia is going to increase exponentially, and the younger generations couldn’t reach their god-given potential, it won’t help to say ‘we didn’t need the masks’. I know how damaging oxygen deprivation is for the brain, cardiologists know how damaging it is for the heart, pulmonologists know how damaging it is for the lungs. Oxygen deprivation damages every single organ. Where are our health departments, our health insurance, our medical associations? It would have been their duty to be vehemently against the lockdown and to stop it and stop it from the very beginning.

  Why do the medical boards issue punishments to doctors who give people exemptions? Does the person or the doctor seriously have to prove that oxygen deprivation harms people? What kind of medicine are our doctors and medical associations representing? Who is responsible for this crime? The ones who want to enforce it? The ones who let it happen and play along, or the ones who don’t prevent it?

  All of the organisations and people she mentions there either

  answer directly to the Cult or do whatever hierarchical levels above

  them tell them to do. The outcome of both is the same. ‘It’s not about

  masks, it’s not about viruses, it’s certainly not about your health’,

  Griesz-Brisson said. ‘It is about much, much more. I am not

  participating. I am not afraid.’ They were taking our air to breathe

  and there was no unfounded medical exemption from face masks.

  Oxygen deprivation was dangerous for every single brain. It had to

  be the free decision of every human being whether they want to

  wear a mask that was absolutely ineffective to protect themselves

  from a virus. She ended by rightly identifying where the

  responsibility lies for all this:

  The imperative of the hour is personal responsibility. We are responsible for what we think, not the media. We are responsible for what we do, not our superiors. We are responsible for our health, not the World Health Organization. And we are responsible for what happens in our country, not the government.

  Halle-bloody-lujah.

  But surgeons wear masks, right?

  Independent studies of mask-wearing have produced a long list of

  reports detailing mental, emotional and physical dangers. What a

  definition of insanity to see police officers imposing mask-wearing

  on the public which will cumulatively damage their health while the

  police themselves wear masks that will cumulatively damage their

  health. It’s u er madness and both public and police do this because

  ‘the government says so’ – yes a government of brain-donor idiots

  like UK Health Secretary Ma Hancock reading the ‘follow the

  science’ scripts of psychopathic, lunatic psychologists. The response

  you get from Stockholm syndrome sufferers defending the very

  authorities that are destroying them and their families is that

  ‘surgeons wear masks’. This is considered the game, set and match

  that they must work and don’t cause oxygen deficit. Well, actually,

  scientific studies have shown that they do and oxygen levels are

  monitored in operating theatres to compensate. Surgeons wear

  masks to stop spi le and such like dropping into open wounds – not

  to stop ‘viral particles’ which are so miniscule they can only be seen

  through an electron microscope. Holes in the masks are significantly

  bigger than ‘viral particles’ and if you sneeze or cough they will

  breach the mask. I watched an incredibly disingenuous ‘experiment’

  that claimed to prove that masks work in catching ‘virus’ material

  from the mouth and nose. They did this with a slow motion camera

  and the mask did block big stuff which stayed inside the mask and

  against the face to be breathed in or cause infections on the face as we have seen with many children. ‘Viral particles’, however, would

  never have been picked up by the camera as they came through the

  mask when they are far too small to be seen. The ‘experiment’ was

  therefore disingenuous and useless.

  Studies have concluded that wearing masks in operating theatres

  (and thus elsewhere) make no difference to preventing infection

  while the opposite is true with toxic shite building up in the mask

  and this had led to an explosion in tooth decay and gum disease

  dubbed by dentists ‘mask mouth’. You might have seen the Internet

  video of a furious American doctor urging people to take off their

  masks a er a four-year-old patient had been rushed to hospital the

  night before and nearly died with a lung infection that doctors

  sourced to mask wearing. A study in the journal Cancer Discovery

  found that inhalation of harmful microbes can contribute to

  advanced stage lung cancer in adults and long-term use of masks

  can help breed dangerous pathogens. Microbiologists have said

  frequent mask wearing creates a moist environment in which

  microbes can grow and proliferate before entering the lungs. The

  Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, or CADTH,

  a Canadian national organisation that provides research and

  analysis to healthcare decision-makers, said this as long ago as 2013

  in a report entitled ‘Use of Surgical Masks in the Operating Room: A

  Review of the Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines’. It said:

  • No evidence was found to support the use of surgical face masks

  to reduce the frequency of surgical site infections

  • No evidence was found on the effectiveness of wearing surgical

  face masks to protect staff from infectious material in the

  operating room.

  • Guidelines recommend the use of surgical face masks by staff in

  the operating room to protect both operating room staff and

  patients (despite the lack of evidence).

  We were told that the world could go back to ‘normal’ with the

  arrival of the ‘vaccines’. When they came, fraudulent as they are, the

  story changed as I knew that it would. We are in the midst of

  transforming ‘normal’, not going back to it. Mary Ramsay, head of

  immunisation at Public Health England, echoed the words of US

  criminal Anthony Fauci who said masks and other regulations must

  stay no ma er if people are vaccinated. The Fauci idiot continued to

  wear two masks – different colours so both could be clearly seen –

  a er he claimed to have been vaccinated. Senator Rand Paul told

  Fauci in one exchange that his double-masks were ‘theatre’ and he

  was right. It’s all theatre. Mary Ramsay back-tracked on the vaccine-

  return-to-normal theme when she said the public may need to wear

  masks and social-distance for years despite the jabs. ‘People have got

  used to those lower-level restrictions now, and [they] can live with

  them’, she said telling us what the idea has been all along. ‘The

  vaccine does not give you a pass, even if you have had it, you must

  continue to follow all the guidelines’ said a Public Health England

  statement which reneged on what we had been told before and

  made having the ‘vaccine’ irrelevant to ‘normality’ even by the

  official story. Spain’s fascist government trumped everyone by

  passing a law mandating the wearing of masks on the beach and

  even when swimming in the sea. The move would have devastated

  what’s le of the Spanish tourist industry, posed potential breathing

  dangers to swimmers and had Northern European sunbathers

  walking around with their forehead brown and the rest of their face

  white as a sheet. The ruling was so crazy that it had to be retracted

  a er pressure from public and tourist industry, but it confirmed

  where the Cult wants to go with masks and how clinically insane

  authority has become. The determination to make masks permanent

  and hide the serious dangers to body and mind can be seen in the

  censorship of scientist Professor Denis Rancourt by Bill Gates-

  funded academic publishing website ResearchGate over his papers

  exposing the dangers and uselessness of masks. Rancourt said:

  ResearchGate today has permanently locked my account, which I have had since 2015. Their reasons graphically show the nature of their attack against democracy, and their corruption of

  science … By their obscene non-logic, a scientific review of science articles reporting on harms caused by face masks has a ‘potential to cause harm’. No criticism of the psychological device (face masks) is tolerated, if the said criticism shows potential to influence public policy.

  This is what happens in a fascist world.

  Where are the ‘greens’ (again)?

  Other dangers of wearing masks especially regularly relate to the

  inhalation of minute plastic fibres into the lungs and the deluge of

  discarded masks in the environment and oceans. Estimates

  predicted that more than 1.5 billion disposable masks will end up in

  the world’s oceans every year polluting the water with tons of plastic

  and endangering marine wildlife. Studies project that humans are

  using 129 billion face masks each month worldwide – about three

  million a minute. Most are disposable and made from plastic, non-

  biodegradable microfibers that break down into smaller plastic

  particles that become widespread in ecosystems. They are li ering

  cities, clogging sewage channels and turning up in bodies of water. I

  have wri en in other books about the immense amounts of

  microplastics from endless sources now being absorbed into the

  body. Rolf Halden, director of the Arizona State University (ASU)

  Biodesign Center for Environmental Health Engineering, was the

  senior researcher in a 2020 study that analysed 47 human tissue

  samples and found microplastics in all of them. ‘We have detected

  these chemicals of plastics in every single organ that we have

  investigated’, he said. I wrote in The Answer about the world being

  deluged with microplastics. A study by the Worldwide Fund for

  Nature (WWF) found that people are consuming on average every

  week some 2,000 tiny pieces of plastic mostly through water and also

  through marine life and the air. Every year humans are ingesting

  enough microplastics to fill a heaped dinner plate and in a life-time

  of 79 years it is enough to fill two large waste bins. Marco

  Lambertini, WWF International director general said: ‘Not only are

  plastics polluting our oceans and waterways and killing marine life –

  it’s in all of us and we can’t escape consuming plastics,’ American

  geologists found tiny plastic fibres, beads and shards in rainwater samples collected from the remote slopes of the Rocky Mountain

  National Park near Denver, Colorado. Their report was headed: ‘It is

  raining plastic.’ Rachel Adams, senior lecturer in Biomedical Science

  at Cardiff Metropolitan University, said that among health

  consequences are internal inflammation and immune responses to a

  ‘foreign body’. She further pointed out that microplastics become

  carriers of toxins including mercury, pesticides and dioxins (a

  known cause of cancer and reproductive and developmental

  problems). These toxins accumulate in the fa y tissues once they

  enter the body through microplastics. Now this is being

  compounded massively by people pu ing plastic on their face and

  throwing it away.

  Workers exposed to polypropylene plastic fibres known as ‘flock’

  have developed ‘flock worker’s lung’ from inhaling small pieces of

  the flock fibres which can damage lung tissue, reduce breathing

  capacity and exacerbate other respiratory problems. Now …

  commonly used surgical masks have three layers of melt-blown

  textiles made of … polypropylene. We have billions of people

  pu ing these microplastics against their mouth, nose and face for

  hours at a time day a er day in the form of masks. How does

  anyone think that will work out? I mean – what could possibly go

  wrong? We posted a number of scientific studies on this at

  davidicke.com, but when I went back to them as I was writing this book the links to the science research website where they were

  hosted were dead. Anything that challenges the official narrative in

  any way is either censored or vilified. The official narrative is so

  unsupportable by the evidence that only deleting the truth can

  protect it. A study by Chinese scientists still survived – with the

  usual twist which it why it was still active, I guess. Yes, they found

  that virtually all the masks they tested increased the daily intake of

  microplastic fibres, but people should still wear them because the

  danger from the ‘virus’ was worse said the crazy ‘team’ from the

  Institute of Hydrobiology in Wuhan. Scientists first discovered

  microplastics in lung tissue of some patients who died of lung cancer

  in the 1990s. Subsequent studies have confirmed the potential health damage with the plastic degrading slowly and remaining in the

  lungs to accumulate in volume. Wuhan researchers used a machine

  simulating human breathing to establish that masks shed up to

  nearly 4,000 microplastic fibres in a month with reused masks

  producing more. Scientists said some masks are laced with toxic

  chemicals and a variety of compounds seriously restricted for both

  health and environmental reasons. They include cobalt (used in blue

  dye) and formaldehyde known to cause watery eyes, burning

  sensations in the eyes, nose, and throat, plus coughing, wheezing

  and nausea. No – that must be ‘Covid-19’.

  Mask ‘worms’

  There is another and potentially even more sinister content of masks.

  Mostly new masks of different makes filmed under a microscope

  around the world have been found to contain strange black fibres or

  ‘worms’ that appear to move or ‘crawl’ by themselves and react to

  heat and water. The nearest I have seen to them are the self-

  replicating fibres that are pulled out through the skin of those

  suffering from Morgellons disease which has been connected to the

  phenomena of ‘chemtrails’ which I will bring into the story later on.