isolated ‘virus’, but comes from a computer-generated model. Frances

  Leader was naturally banned from Cult-owned fascist Twi er for

  making this exchange public. The process of creating computer-

  generated alleged ‘viruses’ is called ‘in silico’ or ‘in silicon’ –

  computer chips – and the term ‘in silico’ is believed to originate with

  biological experiments using only a computer in 1989. ‘Vaccines’

  involved with ‘Covid’ are also produced ‘in silico’ or by computer

  not a natural process. If the original ‘virus’ is nothing more than a

  made-up computer model how can there be ‘new variants’ of

  something that never existed in the first place? They are not new

  ‘variants’; they are new computer models only minutely different to

  the original program and designed to further terrify the population

  into having the ‘vaccine’ and submi ing to fascism. You want a ‘new

  variant’? Click, click, enter – there you go. Tell the medical

  profession that you have discovered a ‘South African variant’, ‘UK

  variants’ or a ‘Brazilian variant’ and in the usual HIV-causes-AIDS

  manner they will unquestioningly repeat it with no evidence

  whatsoever to support these claims. They will go on television and

  warn about the dangers of ‘new variants’ while doing nothing more

  than repeating what they have been told to be true and knowing that

  any deviation from that would be career suicide. Big-time insiders

  will know it’s a hoax, but much of the medical community is clueless

  about the way they are being played and themselves play the public

  without even being aware they are doing so. What an interesting

  ‘coincidence’ that AstraZeneca and Oxford University were

  conducting ‘Covid vaccine trials’ in the three countries – the UK,

  South Africa and Brazil – where the first three ‘variants’ were

  claimed to have ‘broken out’.

  Here’s your ‘virus’ – it’s a unicorn

  Dr Andrew Kaufman presented a brilliant analysis describing how

  the ‘virus’ was imagined into fake existence when he dissected an

  article published by Nature and wri en by 19 authors detailing

  alleged ‘sequencing of a complete viral genome’ of the ‘new SARS-

  CoV-2 virus’. This computer-modelled in silico genome was used as a

  template for all subsequent genome sequencing experiments that

  resulted in the so-called variants which he said now number more

  than 6,000. The fake genome was constructed from more than 56

  million individual short strands of RNA. Those li le pieces were

  assembled into longer pieces by finding areas of overlapping

  sequences. The computer programs created over two million

  possible combinations from which the authors simply chose the

  longest one. They then compared this to a ‘bat virus’ and the

  computer ‘alignment’ rearranged the sequence and filled in the gaps!

  They called this computer-generated abomination the ‘complete

  genome’. Dr Tom Cowan, a fellow medical author and collaborator

  with Kaufman, said such computer-generation constitutes scientific

  fraud and he makes this superb analogy:

  Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.

  The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus’, sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn’, so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.

  This is how the ‘virus’ that has transformed the world was brought

  into fraudulent ‘existence’. Extraordinary, yes, but as the Nazis said

  the bigger the lie the more will believe it. Cowan, however, wasn’t

  finished and he went on to identify what he called the real

  blockbuster in the paper. He quotes this section from a paper wri en

  by virologists and published by the CDC and then explains what it

  means:

  Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549),

  human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. ... Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection.

  No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.

  Cowan explains that when virologists a empt to prove infection

  they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which they can test.

  The first was humans. Exposure to humans was generally not done

  for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any

  coronavirus. The second possible host was animals. Cowan said that

  forge ing for a moment that they never actually use purified virus

  when exposing animals they do use solutions that they claim contain

  the virus. Exposure to animals has been done with SARS-CoV-2 in

  an experiment involving mice and this is what they found: None of

  the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically-modified

  mice, a statistically insignificant number lost weight and had slightly

  bristled fur, but they experienced nothing like the illness called

  ‘Covid-19’. Cowan said the third method – the one they mostly rely

  on – is to inoculate solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety

  of tissue cultures. This process had never been shown to kill tissue

  unless the sample material was starved of nutrients and poisoned as

  part of the process. Yes, incredibly, in tissue experiments designed to

  show the ‘virus’ is responsible for killing the tissue they starve the

  tissue of nutrients and add toxic drugs including antibiotics and they

  do not have control studies to see if it’s the starvation and poisoning

  that is degrading the tissue rather than the ‘virus’ they allege to be in

  there somewhere. You want me to pinch you? Yep, I understand.

  Tom Cowan said this about the whole nonsensical farce as he

  explains what that quote from the CDC paper really means:

  The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 – even in high amounts – were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.

  My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is harmless to human beings.

  That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.

  Cowan concluded: ‘If people really understood how this “science”

  was done, I would hope they would storm the gates and demand

  honesty, transparency and truth.’ Dr Michael Yeadon, former Vice

  President and Chief Scientific Adviser at drug giant Pfizer has been a

  vocal critic of the ‘Covid vaccine’ and its potential for multiple harm.

  He said in an interview in April, 2021, that ‘not one [vaccine] has the

  virus. He was asked why vaccines normally using a ‘dead’ version of

  a disease to activate the immune system were not used for ‘Covid’

  and instead we had the synthetic methods of the ‘mRNA Covid

  vaccine’. Yeadon said that to do the former ‘you’d have to have some

  of [the virus] wouldn’t you?’ He added: ‘No-one’s got any –

  seriously.’ Yeadon said that surely they couldn’t have fooled the

  whole world for a year without having a virus, ‘but oddly enough

  ask around – no one’s got it’. He didn’t know why with all the ‘great

  labs’ around the world that the virus had not been isolated – ‘Maybe

  they’ve been too busy running bad PCR tests and vaccines that

  people don’t need.’ What is today called ‘science’ is not ‘science’ at

  all. Science is no longer what is, but whatever people can be

  manipulated to believe that it is. Real science has been hijacked by the

  Cult to dispense and produce the ‘expert scientists’ and contentions

  that suit the agenda of the Cult. How big-time this has happened

  with the ‘Covid’ hoax which is entirely based on fake science

  delivered by fake ‘scientists’ and fake ‘doctors’. The human-caused

  climate change hoax is also entirely based on fake science delivered

  by fake ‘scientists’ and fake ‘climate experts’. In both cases real

  scientists, climate experts and doctors have their views suppressed and deleted by the Cult-owned science establishment, media and

  Silicon Valley. This is the ‘science’ that politicians claim to be

  ‘following’ and a common denominator of ‘Covid’ and climate are

  Cult psychopaths Bill Gates and his mate Klaus Schwab at the Gates-

  funded World Economic Forum. But, don’t worry, it’s all just a

  coincidence and absolutely nothing to worry about. Zzzzzzzz.

  What is a ‘virus’ REALLY?

  Dr Tom Cowan is one of many contesting the very existence of

  viruses let alone that they cause disease. This is understandable

  when there is no scientific evidence for a disease-causing ‘virus’.

  German virologist Dr Stefan Lanka won a landmark case in 2017 in

  the German Supreme Court over his contention that there is no such

  thing as a measles virus. He had offered a big prize for anyone who

  could prove there is and Lanka won his case when someone sought

  to claim the money. There is currently a prize of more than 225,000

  euros on offer from an Isolate Truth Fund for anyone who can prove

  the isolation of SARS-CoV-2 and its genetic substance. Lanka wrote

  in an article headed ‘The Misconception Called Virus’ that scientists

  think a ‘virus’ is causing tissue to become diseased and degraded

  when in fact it is the processes they are using which do that – not a

  ‘virus’. Lanka has done an important job in making this point clear

  as Cowan did in his analysis of the CDC paper. Lanka says that all

  claims about viruses as disease-causing pathogens are wrong and

  based on ‘easily recognisable, understandable and verifiable

  misinterpretations.’ Scientists believed they were working with

  ‘viruses’ in their laboratories when they were really working with

  ‘typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells …’ Lanka said that

  the tissue decaying process claimed to be caused by a ‘virus’ still

  happens when no alleged ‘virus’ is involved. It’s the process that does

  the damage and not a ‘virus’. The genetic sample is deprived of

  nutrients, removed from its energy supply through removal from

  the body and then doused in toxic antibiotics to remove any bacteria.

  He confirms again that establishment scientists do not (pinch me)

  conduct control experiments to see if this is the case and if they did they would see the claims that ‘viruses’ are doing the damage is

  nonsense. He adds that during the measles ‘virus’ court case he

  commissioned an independent laboratory to perform just such a

  control experiment and the result was that the tissues and cells died

  in the exact same way as with alleged ‘infected’ material. This is

  supported by a gathering number of scientists, doctors and

  researchers who reject what is called ‘germ theory’ or the belief in

  the body being infected by contagious sources emi ed by other

  people. Researchers Dawn Lester and David Parker take the same

  stance in their highly-detailed and sourced book What Really Makes

  You Ill – Why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong

  which was recommended to me by a number of medical

  professionals genuinely seeking the truth. Lester and Parker say

  there is no provable scientific evidence to show that a ‘virus’ can be

  transmi ed between people or people and animals or animals and

  people:

  The definition also claims that viruses are the cause of many diseases, as if this has been definitively proven. But this is not the case; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively demonstrates that any virus is the cause of any disease. The burden of proof for any theory lies with those who proposed it; but none of the existing documents provides

  ‘proof’ that supports the claim that ‘viruses’ are pathogens.

  Dr Tom Cowan employs one of his clever analogies to describe the

  process by which a ‘virus’ is named as the culprit for a disease when

  what is called a ‘virus’ is only material released by cells detoxing

  themselves from infiltration by chemical or radiation poisoning. The

  tidal wave of technologically-generated radiation in the ‘smart’

  modern world plus all the toxic food and drink are causing this to

  happen more than ever. Deluded ‘scientists’ misread this as a

  gathering impact of what they wrongly label ‘viruses’.

  Paper can infect houses

  Cowan said in an article for davidicke.com – with his tongue only

  mildly in his cheek – that he believed he had made a tremendous

  discovery that may revolutionise science. He had discovered that

  small bits of paper are alive, ‘well alive-ish’, can ‘infect’ houses, and

  then reproduce themselves inside the house. The result was that this

  explosion of growth in the paper inside the house causes the house

  to explode, blowing it to smithereens. His evidence for this new

  theory is that in the past months he had carefully examined many of

  the houses in his neighbourhood and found almost no scraps of

  paper on the lawns and surrounds of the house. There was an

  occasional stray label, but nothing more. Then he would return to

  these same houses a week or so later and with a few, not all of them,

  particularly the old and decrepit ones, he found to his shock and

  surprise they were li ered with stray bits of paper. He knew then

  that the paper had infected these houses, made copies of itself, and

  blew up the house. A young boy on a bicycle at one of the sites told

  him he had seen a demolition crew using dynamite to explode the

  house the previous week, but Cowan dismissed this as the idle

  thoughts of silly boys because ‘I was on to something big’. He was

  on to how ‘scientists’ mistake genetic material in the detoxifying

  process for something they call a ‘virus’. Cowan said of his house

  and paper story:

  If this sounds crazy to you, it’s because it should. This scenario is obviously nuts. But consider this admittedly embellished, for effect, current viral theory that all scientists, medical doctors and virologists currently believe.

  He takes the example of the ‘novel SARS-Cov2’ virus to prove the

  point. First they take someone with an undefined illness called

  ‘Covid-19’ and don’t even a empt to find any virus in their sputum.

  Never mind the scientists still describe how this ‘virus’, which they

  have not located a aches to a cell receptor, injects its genetic

  material, in ‘Covid’s’ case, RNA, into the cell. The RNA once inserted

  exploits the cell to reproduce itself and makes ‘thousands, nay

  millions, of copies of itself … Then it emerges victorious to claim its

  next victim’:

  If you were to look in the scientific literature for proof, actual scientific proof, that uniform SARS-CoV2 viruses have been properly isolated from the sputum of a sick person, that actual spike proteins could be seen protruding from the virus (which has not been found), you would find that such evidence doesn’t exist.

  If you go looking in the published scientific literature for actual pictures, proof, that these spike proteins or any viral proteins are ever attached to any receptor embedded in any cell membrane, you would also find that no such evidence exists. If you were to look for a video or documented evidence of the intact virus injecting its genetic material into the body of the cell, reproducing itself and then emerging victorious by budding off the cell membrane, you would find that no such evidence exists.

  The closest thing you would find is electron micrograph pictures of cellular particles, possibly attached to cell debris, both of which to be seen were stained by heavy metals, a process that completely distorts their architecture within the living organism. This is like finding bits of paper stuck to the blown-up bricks, thereby proving the paper emerged by taking pieces of the bricks on its way out.