Science fiction the best.., p.29
Science Fiction: The Best of 2002,
p.29
communicating with the Martians.”
“Are you crazy?” Scowling darkly, Melvin turned to-
ward Rupert and jerked an accusing thumb in my direc-
tion. “Dr. Onslo thinks my amplifier still works even
though half the tubes are burned out.”
“He’s a psychiatrist,” Rupert explained. “He knows
nothing about engineering. How was your catatonic stu-
por?”
“Restful. You’ll have to come along some time.”
“I haven’t got the courage,” said Rupert.
Melvin was enchanted by the gift of the bananas, and
even more enchanted to be reunited with his fellow para-
noid. As the two middle-aged madmen headed east,
swapping jokes and stories like old school chums, I could barely keep up with their frenetic pace. After passing
Sixth Avenue they turned abruptly into Bryant Park,
where they found an abandoned soccer ball on the grass.
For twenty minutes they kicked it back and forth, then
grew weary of the sport. They sat down on a bench. I
joined them. Survivors streamed by holding handker-
chiefs over their faces.
2 7 4
T H E WA R O F T H E WO R L DV I E W S
“The city’s dying,” I told Melvin. “We need your help.”
“Rupert, have you still got the touch?” Melvin asked
his friend.
“I believe I do,” said Rupert.
“Rupert can fix burned-out vacuum tubes merely by
laying his hands on them,” Melvin informed me. “I call
him the Cathode Christ.”
Even before Melvin finished his sentence, Rupert had
begun fondling the amplifier. He rubbed each tube as if
the warmth of his hand might bring it to life.
“You’ve done it again!” cried Melvin, putting on his
headphones. “I’m pulling in a signal from Ceres! I think it might be just the place for us to retire, Rupert! No capital gains tax!” He removed the phones and looked me in the
eye. “Do you solicit me as head of the Epistemology Com-
mittee or in my capacity as a paranoid schizophrenic?”
“The former,” I said. “I’m hoping you’ve managed to
define the Phobos-Deimos rift.”
“You came to the right place.” Melvin ate a banana,
depositing the peel in the dish antenna atop his head.
“It’s the most basic of Weltanschauung dichotomies. Here on Earth many philosophers would trace the problem
back to all that bad blood between the Platonists and the Aristotelians—you know, idealism versus realism—but it’s
actually the sort of controversy you can have only after a full-blown curiosity about nature has come on the
scene.”
“Do you speak of the classic schism between scientific
materialists and those who champion presumed numi-
nous realities?” I asked.
“Exactly,” said Melvin.
“There—what did I tell you?” said Rupert merrily. “I
knew old Melvin would set us straight.”
2 7 5
J A M E S M O R R O W
“On the one hand, Deimos, moon of the logical posi-
tivists,” said Melvin. “On the other hand, Phobos, bastion of revealed religion.”
“Melvin, you’re a genius,” said Rupert, retrieving his
telescope from my rucksack.
“Should we infer that the Phobosians are loath to
evoke Darwinian mechanisms in explaining why they
look so different from the Deimosians?” I asked.
“Quite so.” Melvin unstrapped the dish antenna,
scratched his head, and nodded. “The Phobes believe that
God created them in his own image.”
“They think God looks like a pencil sharpener?”
“That is one consequence of their religion, yes.”
Melvin donned his antenna and retrieved a bottle of red
capsules from his bathrobe pocket. He fished one out and
ate it. “Want to hear the really nutty part? The Phobes
and the Deems are genetically wired to abandon any
given philosophical position the moment it encounters an
honest and coherent refutation. The Martians won’t ac-
cept no for an answer, and they won’t accept yes for an
answer either—instead they want rational arguments.”
“Rational arguments?” I said. “Then why the hell are
they killing each other and bringing down New York with
them?”
“If you were a dog, a dead possum would look like the
Mona Lisa,” said Rupert.
Melvin explained, “No one has ever presented them
with a persuasive discourse favoring either the Phobosian or the Deimosian worldview.”
“You mean we could end this nightmare by supplying
the Martians with some crackerjack reasons why theistic
revelation is the case?” I said.
“Either that, or some crackerjack reasons why scien-
2 7 6
T H E WA R O F T H E WO R L DV I E W S
tific materialism is the case,” said Melvin. “I realize it’s fashionable these days to speak of an emergent compati-bility between the two idioms, but you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to realize that the concept of materialistic supernaturalism is oxymoronic if not plainly moronic,
and nobody knows this better than the Martians.” He
pulled the headphones over his ears.
“Ha! Just as I suspected. The civilization on Ceres di-
vides neatly into those who have exact change and those
who don’t.”
“The problem, as I see it, is twofold,” said Rupert, pointing his telescope south toward the Empire State Building.
“We must construct the rational arguments in question,
and we must communicate them to the Martians.”
“They don’t speak English, do they?” I said.
“Of course they don’t speak English,” said Rupert, ex-
asperated. “They’re Martians. They don’t even have lan-
guage as we commonly understand the term.” He poked
Melvin on the shoulder. “This is clearly a job for Annie.”
“What?” said Melvin, removing the headphones.
“It’s a job for Annie,” said Rupert.
“Agreed,” said Melvin.
“Who?” I said.
“Annie Porlock,” said Rupert. “She built her own
harpsichord.”
“Soul of an artist,” said Melvin.
“Heart of an angel,” said Rupert.
“For our immediate purpose, the most relevant fact
about Annie is that she chairs our Interplanetary Com-
munications Committee, in which capacity she cracked
the Martian tweets and twitters, or so she claimed right
before the medics took her away.”
“How do we find her?” I asked.
2 7 7
J A M E S M O R R O W
“For many years she was locked up in some wretched
Long Island laughing academy, but then the family
lawyer got into the act,” said Melvin. “I’m pretty sure
they transferred her to a more humane facility here in
New York.”
“What facility?” I said. “Where?”
“I can’t remember,” said Melvin.
“You’ve got to remember.”
“Sorry.”
“Try.”
Melvin picked up the soccer ball and set it in his lap.
“Fresh from the guillotine, the head of Maximilien-
Françoise-Marie-Isidore de Robespierre,” he said, as if
perhaps I’d forgotten he was a paranoid schizophrenic.
“Oh, Robespierre, Robespierre, was the triumph of inad-
vertence over intention ever so total?”
I brought both lunatics home with me. Valerie greeted
us with the sad news that the Winter Garden, the Walter
Kerr, the Eugene O’Neill, and half a dozen other White
Way theaters had been lost in the Battle of Times Square.
I told her there was hope for the Big Apple yet.
“It all depends on our ability to devise a set of robust
arguments favoring either scientific materialism or theistic revelation and then communicating the salient points
to the Martians in their nonlinguistic language, which
was apparently deciphered several years ago by a para-
noid schizophrenic named Annie Porlock,” I told Valerie.
“That’s not a sentence you hear every day,” she
replied.
It turns out that Melvin is even more devoted to board
games than Rupert, so the evening went well. We played
Scrabble, Clue, and Monopoly, after which Melvin intro-
duced us to an amusement of his own invention, a varia-
2 7 8
T H E WA R O F T H E WO R L DV I E W S
tion on Trivial Pursuit called Teleological Ambition.
Whereas the average Trivial Pursuit conundrum is frivo-
lous, the challenges underlying Teleological Ambition are profound. Melvin remembered at least half of the original questions, writing them out on three-by-five cards. If
God is infinite and self-sufficient, why would he care
whether his creatures worshiped him or not? Which
thought is the more overwhelming: the possibility that
the Milky Way is teeming with sentient life, or the possibility that Earthlings and Martians occupy an otherwise
empty galaxy? That sort of thing. Bobby hated every
minute, and I can’t say I blame him.
AUGUST 12
Shortly after breakfast this morning, while he was
consuming what may have been the last fresh egg in
SoHo, Melvin announced that he knew how to track
down Annie Porlock.
“I was thinking of how she’s a walking Rosetta Stone,
our key to deciphering the Martian tongue,” he ex-
plained, strapping on his dish antenna. “Rosetta made me
think of Roosevelt, and then I remembered that she’s liv-
ing in a houseboat moored by Roosevelt Island in the
middle of the East River.”
I went to the pantry and filled my rucksack with a loaf
of stale bread, a jar of instant coffee, a Kellogg’s Variety Pack, and six cans of Campbell’s soup. The can opener
was nowhere to be found, so I tossed in my Swiss army
knife. I guided my lunatics out the door.
There were probably only a handful of taxis still func-
tioning in New York—most of them had run out of gas,
2 7 9
J A M E S M O R R O W
and their owners couldn’t refuel because the pumps
worked on electricity—but somehow we managed to nab
one at the corner of Houston and Forsyth. The driver, a
Russian immigrant, named Vladimir, was not surprised to
learn we had no cash, all the ATMs being dormant, and
he agreed to claim his fare in groceries. He piloted us
north along First Avenue, running straight through fifty-
seven defunct traffic signals, and left us off at the
Queensboro Bridge. I gave him two cans of chicken noo-
dle soup and a single-serving box of Frosted Flakes.
The Martian force-field dome had divided Roosevelt
Island right down the middle, but luckily Annie Porlock
had moored her houseboat on the Manhattan side.
“Houseboat” isn’t the right word, for the thing was nei-
ther a house nor a boat but a decrepit two-room shack
sitting atop a half-submerged barge called the Folly to Be Wise. Evidently the hull was leaking. If Annie’s residence sank any lower, I thought as we entered the shack, the
East River would soon be lapping at her ankles.
A ruddy, zaftig, silver-haired woman in her mid-fifties
lay dozing in a wicker chair, her lap occupied by a book
about Buddhism and a large calico cat. Her harpsichord
rose against the far wall, beside a lamp table holding a
large bottle of orange capsules the size of jelly beans. Our footfalls woke her. Recognizing Rupert, Annie let loose a whoop of delight. The cat bailed out. She stood up.
“Melvin Haskin?” said Annie, sashaying across the
room. “Is that really you? They let you out?”
Annie extended her right hand. Melvin kissed it.
“Taa-daa!” shouted Rupert, stepping out from behind
Melvin’s bulky frame. His pressed his mouth against An-
nie’s cheek.
2 8 0
T H E WA R O F T H E WO R L DV I E W S
“Rupert Klieg—they sprang you, too!” said Annie. “If I
knew you were coming, I’d have baked a fruitcake.”
“The First Annual Reunion of the Asaph Hall Society
will now come to order,” said Melvin, chuckling.
“Have you heard about the Martians?” said Rupert.
Annie’s eyes widened grotesquely, offering a brief in-
timation of the derangement that lay behind. “They’ve
landed? Really? You can’t be serious!”
“Cross my heart,” said Rupert. “Even as we speak, the
Phobes and the Deems are thrashing out their differences
in Times Square.”
“Just as we predicted,” said Annie. Turning from Ru-
pert, she fixed her frowning gaze on me. “I guess that’ll show you doubting Thomases . . .”
Rupert introduced me as “Dr. Onslo, the first in a long
line of distinguished psychiatrists who tried to help me
before hyperlithium came on the market,” and I didn’t
bother to contradict him. Instead I explained the situation to Annie, emphasizing Melvin’s recent deductions concerning Martian dialectics. She was astonished to learn
that the Deimosians and the Phobosians were occupying
Manhattan in direct consequence of the old materialism-
supernaturalism dispute, and equally astonished to learn
that, in contrast to most human minds, the Martian psy-
che was hardwired to favor rational discourse over pleas-
urable opinion.
“That must be the strangest evolutionary adaptation
ever,” said Annie.
“Certainly the strangest we know about,” said Melvin.
“Can you help us?” I asked.
Approaching her harpsichord, Annie sat on her
swiveling stool and rested her hands on the keyboard.
2 8 1
J A M E S M O R R O W
“This looks like a harpsichord, but it’s really an interplanetary communication device. I’ve spent the last three
years recalibrating the jacks, upgrading the plectrums,
and adjusting the strings.”
Her fingers glided across the keys. A jumble of notes
leaped forth, so weird and discordant they made Schoen-
berg sound melodic.
“There,” said Annie proudly, pivoting toward her audi-
ence. “In the Martian language I just said, ‘Before en-
lightenment, chop wood, carry water. After
enlightenment, chop wood, carry water.’ ”
“Wow,” said Klieg.
“Terrific,” said Melvin.
Annie turned back to the keyboard and called forth
another unruly refrain.
“That meant, ‘There are two kinds of naïveté: the
naïveté of optimism and the naïveté of pessimism,’ ” she
explained.
“Who would’ve guessed there could be so much mean-
ing in cacophony?” I said.
“To a polar bear, the Arctic Ocean feels like a Jacuzzi,”
said Rupert.
Annie called forth a third strain—another grotesque
non-melody.
“And the translation?” asked Rupert.
“It’s an idiomatic expression,” she replied.
“Can you give us a rough paraphrase?”
“ ‘Hi there, baby. You have great tits. Would you like to fuck?’ ”
Melvin said, “The problem, of course, is that the Mar-
tians are likely to kill each other—along with the remaining population of New York—before we can decide
2 8 2
T H E WA R O F T H E WO R L DV I E W S
conclusively which worldview enjoys the imprimatur of
rationality.”
“All is not lost,” said Rupert.
“What do you mean?” I asked.
“We might, just might, have enough time to formulate
strong arguments supporting a side of the controversy
chosen . . . arbitrarily,” said Rupert.
“Arbitrarily?” echoed Annie, voice cracking.
“Arbitrarily,” repeated Rupert. “It’s the only way.”
The four of us traded glances of reluctant consensus. I
removed a quarter from my pants pocket.
“Heads: revelation, God, the Phobes,” said Melvin.
“Tails: materialism, science, the Deems,” said Rupert.
I flipped the quarter. It landed under Annie’s piano
stool, frightening the cat.
Tails.
And so we went at it, a melee of discourse and dispu-
tation that lasted through the long, hot afternoon and
well into evening. We napped on the floor. We pissed in
the river. We ate cold soup and dry raisin bran.
By eight o’clock we’d put the Deimosian worldview on
solid ground—or so we believed. The gist of our argument
was that sentient species emerged in consequence of cer-
tain discoverable properties embedded in nature. Whether
Earthling or Martian, aquatic or terrestrial, feathered or furred, scaled or smooth, all life-forms were inextricably woven into a material biosphere, and it was this astonishing and demonstrable connection, not the agenda of
some hypothetical supernatural agency, that made us one
with the cosmos and the bearers of its meaning.












